New York’s New Gun Laws Would Be Much Worse If NY Dems Would Have Had There Way

Jan 19th, 2013 | By | Category: Amendment 2 - Arms, Lead, News

Check out this short clip of New York Assemblyman, Steve McLaughlin, wrapping up a debate with a Democrat imbecile, Joseph Lentol of Brooklyn, (there are several other, longer, videos of the extended debate that are well worth watching) regarding the ill-conceived and poorly thought out “SAFE” Bill shoved down New Yorkers throats by their moronic, grand-standing, egomaniac governor, Andrew Cuomo.

YouTube Preview Image

In this segment, McLaughlin states that he has a list of the amendments that Democrats wanted to include in their atrocious “Emergency” Gun Grab.  Lentol kind of freaks out a bit and says that it “shouldn’t be brought up or released because it would impugn compromise” to which McLaughlin states, “Yes, attempts at outright ‘Assault Weapon’ bans would certainly end compromise.”

mclaughlinSo, after the debate, he released the list – here are the things New York Dems wanted to include in their idiotic legislation that were shut-down by the Republican side of the House:

  1. Confiscation of “assault weapons”
  2. Confiscation of ten round magazines
  3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
  4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder’s information to be placed in the public
  5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as “assault weapons”
  6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
  7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
  8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
  9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
  10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
  11. State issued pistol permits
  12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
  13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
  14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
  15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons

In other words – not only do they want to steal most of the law abiding citizens guns, they want to severely limit and impede citizens ability to continue owning them.

But, they’re “Not coming for our guns”, right?  Sheah – only because there are still a few good men who are fighting the fight for us.  If they had their way, we’d all be disarmed, except for the criminals.

So, this begs the question: Why do Democrats hate their constituency so much that they want to turn them all in to victims for no reason whatsoever?  As well as the on-going question: Why do Democrats refuse to enact legislation that will help protect people from Mass Murder?

 

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.